Friday, November 17, 2006

Family Planning?




How can we have a new chief of "Family Planning" at the Department of Health and Human Services who doesn't believe in family planning? From the Washington Post:


The Bush administration has appointed a new chief of family-planning programs at the Department of Health and Human Services who worked at a Christian pregnancy-counseling organization that regards the distribution of contraceptives as "demeaning to women."

Eric Keroack, medical director for A Woman's Concern, a nonprofit group based in Dorchester, Mass., will become deputy assistant secretary for population affairs in the next two weeks, department spokeswoman Christina Pearson said yesterday.

Keroack, an obstetrician-gynecologist, will advise Secretary Mike Leavitt on matters such as reproductive health and adolescent pregnancy. He will oversee $283 million in annual family-planning grants that, according to HHS, are "designed to provide access to contraceptive supplies and information to all who want and need them with priority given to low-income persons."

The appointment, which does not require Senate confirmation, was the latest provocative personnel move by the White House since Democrats won control of Congress in this month's midterm elections. President Bush last week pushed the Senate to confirm John R. Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations and this week renominated six candidates for appellate court judgeships who have previously been blocked by lawmakers. Democrats said the moves belie Bush's post-election promises of bipartisanship.

The Keroack appointment angered many family-planning advocates, who noted that A Woman's Concern supports sexual abstinence until marriage, opposes contraception and does not distribute information promoting birth control at its six centers in eastern Massachusetts.

"A Woman's Concern is persuaded that the crass commercialization and distribution of birth control is demeaning to women, degrading of human sexuality and adverse to human health and happiness," the group's Web site says.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

HY Doc:

Here I am half a click from Columbus.
Don't have my password and i'm on the In-Laws PC.
It's Sunday and I was wondering if there was anybody on the AAR blog who wanted to lay money on the Wolverines. I'm still taking bets from Republicans.
DeWine may be coming over later. I guess I'll have to apologize for being glad that he lost.
Go Buckeyes.

Bun Bun Bunceremos.

eyedoc333 said...

Heya, Bun! I hope you're having a good trip!

Snerd Gronk said...

'Re: Gale': A Woman's Concern supports sexual abstinence until marriage,

SG: At which time marriage takes over the promotion ...

Snerd

Snerd Gronk said...

'Aye Dock': "A Woman's Concern is persuaded that the crass commercialization and distribution of birth control is demeaning to women, degrading of human sexuality and adverse to human health and happiness," the group's Web site says.

SG: In spite of acknowledging there may be a few holes in the approach, is hope by AWC that such claims will act as a prophylatic against premarital sex.

Snerd

Anonymous said...

Rights of the unborn from the OT.

exodus 21:22

When people who are fighting injure a pregnant woman so that there is a miscarriage, and yet no further harm follows, the one responsible shall be fined what the woman's husband demands, paying as much as the judge determines.

According to the previous passage it appears that those States who have passed laws in protection of the Fetus are in direct violation of the laws of God.
I find it interesting that they claim that is where their authority comes from.

If they learn to read we could have real problems.

Bun Bun.

Snerd Gronk said...

Bunz: If they learn to read we could have real problems.


SG: Yes ... They could become more 'reproductive' with their 'dis-semination' ...

Snerd