Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Bush's Science Policies: Bad For Our Health




There's a very interesting article in the New Yorker that describes how Bush's regressive science policies, based on religious fundamentalism, have hurt Americans in a multitude of ways. It is a long article, so I'll post an excerpt here--

Vaccinations for contagious diseases like measles and mumps are required before a child can enter public school. That won't be the case with the HPV [cervical cancer] vaccine, however. The Bush Administration, its allies on Capitol Hill, and the religious base of the Republican Party are opposed to mandatory HPV vaccinations. They prefer to rely on education programs that promote abstinence from sexual activity, and see the HPV vaccine as a threat to that policy. For years, conservatives have regarded the human papillomavirus as a kind of index of promiscuity. Many abstinence supporters argue that eliminating the threat of infection would only encourage teen-agers to have sex. "I personally object to vaccinating children when they don't need vaccinations, particularly against a disease that is one hundred per cent preventable with proper sexual behavior,'' Leslee J. Unruh, the founder and president of the Abstinence Clearinghouse, said. "Premarital sex is dangerous, even deadly. Let's not encourage it by vaccinating ten-year-olds so they think they're safe.'' Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, a family physician and a prominent leader among those who believe that abortion should be illegal, has argued repeatedly in Congress that since condoms can fail, the nation should stop relying on them so heavily. In 2004, he made his position clear when he testified about his experience treating patients who have been infected with HPV: "Studies have indicated for years that promiscuity was associated with cervical cancer.''
You can view the entire article here: http://www.michaelspecter.com/ny/2006/2006_03_13_bush.html

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Moses was instructed by God to take a pole and put a bronze snake on it. The Nehushtan, was used to save Israelites bitten by venomous snake.

Your friend:


Rod Asclepius

Anonymous said...

T2's trivia for the day.

Hy Doc:

Did you know that the double Helix Caduseus was originally the Logo for Commerce and not medicine?

That is why you occasionally see it with only one serpent. The healers did not want their symbol to be mistaken for commerce.

Of course that was many moon's before Hmos and the derivitives.

T2

eyedoc333 said...

T2- I did not know that!

Heather Kirkwood said...

Hey Doc!
You know the word "should" is the most dangerous word in the English language. I might be quite conservative in what I think people "should" do, but we've got to live in the land of reality and not should. The idea that some teenage girl isn't going to have sex because she might get cervical cancer seems to me so far off the mark to understanding behaviour that were it not so dangerous it would seem funny!

There was another really good article in The New Yorker about drug trials. Check it out at: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/061218fa_fact This one has been keeping my mind up at night debating with myself. I'm off to NIH tomorrow actually to do my best immitation of a guinea pig. Being in a clinical trial isn't always easy. For starters, every single sick day and vacation day I have for the next five years is spoken for. Not to mention the mind games that go on in your head every time you've got to show up for these tests. If I could get Pirfenidone at home and be sure I was getting the real stuff and not a placebo - I'd be a fool not to do that. But, where would the science be then? At the same time, I watched 11 of my friends die in between the end of the Phase II trial and the start of the Phase III trial (a gap of three years and those were just the HPS'ers I knew personally). That time in between had absolutely nothing to do with the effecacy or safety of the drug. I'm watching other friends get sicker that have been turned down for this trial because of other health problems. If the other problems and likely complications are known, why is it not possible to create a separate arm of a study for those patients and simply not count their histories in the labeling data? Anyway, it was a very interesting article. I'm not sure how I feel about it all yet.

KEvron said...

seeing as aids is god's way of punishing homosexuals, iv drug users and other liberals, the godliness in denying a vaccine for a sexually-incurred disease seems obvious enough to me.

BAN PENICILLIN!

KEvron

eyedoc333 said...

Good luck at NIH, Heather!

And KEvrons, you appear to be ANTI-biotic! ;)