Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Plagiarism, part trois
Well, I finally heard from the Indian journal editor in the case of plagiarism:
Dear Eyedoc.
Since i was out of town i could'nt reply to your email. i am investigating the matter and will let you know the developments regarding the case of plagiarism.
Thanking you,
Editor
Not much, but it's a start.
Now, is it just me, or does his message seem not the most grammatically correct for an editor of a journal that is entirely published in English?
Meanwhile, my editor has contacted Medline and they've promised to link the fraudulent article to its retraction, as soon as the Indian journal takes action.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
It's a paradox. The editors cannot properly address your concerns until they locate an "I'm sorry we plagiarized" letter.
The editor for the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology doesn't know much about big eyes, does he?
Now that's a capital idea!
He deserves 20 lashes for that one!
*winks*
The editor for the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology doesn't know much about big eyes, does he?
It's almost as if they wanted to send doc the tease and cross the eye!
Aye-aye.
Anon: The editor for the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology doesn't know much about big eyes, does he?
SG: Rather myopic, really.
Snerd
Maybe it's just a case of double vision...
Post a Comment